OpenELIS GlobalvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenELIS Global | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Healthcare | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 278 | 17 185 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | 3.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 54/100 for OpenELIS Global, so it is the safer default.
OpenELIS Global ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; OpenELIS Global needs more configuration.
Upptime is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
OpenELIS Global details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenELIS Global, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with