MirobodyvsOpenELIS Global
Two self-hosted Healthcare projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mirobody | OpenELIS Global | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #3 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 1 395 | 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 8 |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 | 3.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Mirobody scores 56/100 against 54/100 for OpenELIS Global, so it is the safer default.
Mirobody ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for OpenELIS Global.
Mirobody details →OpenELIS Global details →All Healthcare projects →
Swap a project
Keep Mirobody, compare it with
Keep OpenELIS Global, compare it with