MirobodyvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mirobody | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 1 397 | 17 185 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.
Mirobody ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Mirobody needs more configuration.
Mirobody details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep Mirobody, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with