OpenELIS GlobalvsQinglong
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenELIS Global | Qinglong | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Healthcare | #3 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 278 | 20 023 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 2 |
| Latest release | 3.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Qinglong scores 69/100 against 54/100 for OpenELIS Global, so it is the safer default.
OpenELIS Global ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Qinglong.
If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; OpenELIS Global needs more configuration.
OpenELIS Global details →Qinglong details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenELIS Global, compare it with
Keep Qinglong, compare it with