MirobodyvsQinglong
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mirobody | Qinglong | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #3 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 396 | 20 022 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 2 |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Qinglong scores 69/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.
Mirobody ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Qinglong.
If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; Mirobody needs more configuration.
Mirobody details →Qinglong details →
Swap a project
Keep Mirobody, compare it with
Keep Qinglong, compare it with