OpenELIS GlobalvsPostgREST
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenELIS Global | PostgREST | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Healthcare | #2 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 278 | 27 737 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +60 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 20 |
| Latest release | 3.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Haskell |
Which one should you pick?
PostgREST scores 79/100 against 54/100 for OpenELIS Global, so it is the safer default.
PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for OpenELIS Global.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; OpenELIS Global needs more configuration.
PostgREST is growing faster right now (+60 stars in 30 days).
OpenELIS Global details →PostgREST details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenELIS Global, compare it with
Keep PostgREST, compare it with