MirobodyvsPostgREST
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mirobody | PostgREST | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #2 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 1 397 | 27 737 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +60 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 20 |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Haskell |
Which one should you pick?
PostgREST scores 79/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.
PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Mirobody.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; Mirobody needs more configuration.
PostgREST is growing faster right now (+60 stars in 30 days).
Mirobody details →PostgREST details →
Swap a project
Keep Mirobody, compare it with
Keep PostgREST, compare it with