Onetime SecretvsSkySend
Two self-hosted PrivateBin alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Onetime Secret | SkySend | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Secrets Management | #43 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 2 978 | 447 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 29 | 17 |
| Latest release | v0.26.19 · 25 Oct 2026 | v3.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Onetime Secret scores 61/100 against 51/100 for SkySend, so it is the safer default.
Onetime Secret ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for SkySend.
If you want the quickest setup, SkySend is easier to run; Onetime Secret needs more configuration.
Onetime Secret is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).
Onetime Secret details →SkySend details → All PrivateBin alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep Onetime Secret, compare it with
Keep SkySend, compare it with