Onetime Secretvsscrt.link
Two self-hosted PrivateBin alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Onetime Secret | scrt.link | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Secrets Management | #24 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 2 978 | 79 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 29 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.26.19 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Onetime Secret scores 61/100 against 43/100 for scrt.link, so it is the safer default.
Onetime Secret ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for scrt.link.
If you want the quickest setup, Onetime Secret is easier to run; scrt.link needs more configuration.
Onetime Secret is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).
Onetime Secret details →scrt.link details → All PrivateBin alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep Onetime Secret, compare it with
Keep scrt.link, compare it with