OmniRoutevstrigger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniRoute | trigger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 82 242 | 16 646 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 226 | +259 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 49 |
| Latest release | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 76/100 for trigger, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OmniRoute.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 226 stars in 30 days).
OmniRoute details →trigger details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with
Keep trigger, compare it with