OmniVoice-Studiovstrigger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniVoice-Studio | trigger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 92 336 | 16 641 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 395 | +254 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 49 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 76/100 for trigger, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 35 for OmniVoice-Studio.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 395 stars in 30 days).
OmniVoice-Studio details →trigger details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with
Keep trigger, compare it with