OctoprintvsWazuh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Octoprint | Wazuh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 9 167 | 17 481 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 | +490 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 9 |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | v4.14.9 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
Wazuh scores 80/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.
Wazuh ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.
If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; Wazuh needs more configuration.
Wazuh is growing faster right now (+490 stars in 30 days).
Octoprint details →Wazuh details →