LinuxCNCvsOctoprint
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LinuxCNC | Octoprint | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 2 512 | 9 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | +59 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.9.10 · 3 Jul 2026 | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Octoprint scores 73/100 against 64/100 for LinuxCNC, so it is the safer default.
Octoprint ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for LinuxCNC.
If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; LinuxCNC needs more configuration.
Octoprint is growing faster right now (+59 stars in 30 days).
LinuxCNC details →Octoprint details →
Swap a project
Keep LinuxCNC, compare it with
Keep Octoprint, compare it with