OctoprintvsSuper Productivity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Octoprint | Super Productivity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #1 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 9 170 | 23 250 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | +1 010 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 22 |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Super Productivity scores 83/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.
Super Productivity ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.
If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; Octoprint needs more configuration.
Super Productivity is growing faster right now (+1 010 stars in 30 days).
Octoprint details →Super Productivity details →