OctoprintvsRustDesk Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Octoprint | RustDesk Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #4 of 22 in Remote Desktop |
| GitHub stars | 9 167 | 10 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +59 | +179 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 2 |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | 1.1.16 · 20 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
RustDesk Server scores 75/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.
Octoprint ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for RustDesk Server.
If you want the quickest setup, RustDesk Server is easier to run; Octoprint needs more configuration.
RustDesk Server is growing faster right now (+179 stars in 30 days).
Octoprint details →RustDesk Server details →