Octoprintvsopenvox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Octoprint | openvox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #5 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 9 167 | 199 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +59 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 16 |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | 9.2.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Octoprint scores 73/100 against 53/100 for openvox, so it is the safer default.
openvox ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.
If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; openvox needs more configuration.
Octoprint is growing faster right now (+59 stars in 30 days).
Octoprint details →openvox details →