MuckScrapervsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MuckScraper | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 6 in Feed Aggregator | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 159 | 393 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 876 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 37 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 46/100 for MuckScraper, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MuckScraper.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; MuckScraper needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 876 stars in 30 days).
MuckScraper details →openclaw details →
Swap a project
Keep MuckScraper, compare it with
Keep openclaw, compare it with