MuckScrapervsOllama
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MuckScraper | Ollama | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 95/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 6 in Feed Aggregator | #1 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 159 | 185 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 593 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 50 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.40.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Ollama scores 95/100 against 46/100 for MuckScraper, so it is the safer default.
Ollama ships more often: 50 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MuckScraper.
If you want the quickest setup, Ollama is easier to run; MuckScraper needs more configuration.
Ollama is growing faster right now (+3 593 stars in 30 days).
MuckScraper details →Ollama details →
Swap a project
Keep MuckScraper, compare it with
Keep Ollama, compare it with