MuckScrapervsnocodb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MuckScraper | nocodb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 6 in Feed Aggregator | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 159 | 65 374 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +320 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 46/100 for MuckScraper, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MuckScraper.
If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; MuckScraper needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+320 stars in 30 days).
MuckScraper details →nocodb details →
Swap a project
Keep MuckScraper, compare it with
Keep nocodb, compare it with