MTranServervsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MTranServer | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Translation | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 4 731 | 11 125 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 12 |
| Latest release | v5.1.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Java |
Which one should you pick?
SonarQube scores 71/100 against 63/100 for MTranServer, so it is the safer default.
SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for MTranServer.
If you want the quickest setup, MTranServer is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
SonarQube is growing faster right now (+103 stars in 30 days).
MTranServer details →SonarQube details →
Swap a project
Keep MTranServer, compare it with
Keep SonarQube, compare it with