PDFMathTranslatevsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PDFMathTranslate | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Translation | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 38 016 | 11 125 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +304 | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
PDFMathTranslate scores 80/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for PDFMathTranslate.
If you want the quickest setup, PDFMathTranslate is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
PDFMathTranslate is growing faster right now (+304 stars in 30 days).
PDFMathTranslate details →SonarQube details →
Swap a project
Keep PDFMathTranslate, compare it with
Keep SonarQube, compare it with