MTranServervsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MTranServer | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Translation | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 4 730 | 92 336 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | +57 395 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 35 |
| Latest release | v5.1.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 62/100 for MTranServer, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for MTranServer.
If you want the quickest setup, MTranServer is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 395 stars in 30 days).
MTranServer details →OmniVoice-Studio details →
Swap a project
Keep MTranServer, compare it with
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with