MirobodyvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mirobody | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 1 397 | 6 052 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.
Mirobody ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Mirobody is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Zammad is growing faster right now (+100 stars in 30 days).
Mirobody details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Mirobody, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with