Open Data CapturevsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Data Capture | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Data Collection | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 119 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.5.2 · 25 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 47/100 for Open Data Capture, so it is the safer default.
Open Data Capture ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Open Data Capture is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Zammad is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).
Open Data Capture details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Open Data Capture, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with