oncodashvsOpenScribe
Two self-hosted Healthcare projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| oncodash | OpenScribe | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 28/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Healthcare | #4 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 16 | 223 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | v0.1.1 · 12 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Vue | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenScribe scores 44/100 against 28/100 for oncodash, so it is the safer default.
OpenScribe ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for oncodash.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenScribe is easier to run; oncodash needs more configuration.
oncodash details →OpenScribe details →All Healthcare projects →
Swap a project
Keep oncodash, compare it with
Keep OpenScribe, compare it with