MirobodyvsopenGym
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mirobody | openGym | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 1 396 | 17 093 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 924 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 12 |
| Latest release | 1.5.9 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.4.3 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
openGym scores 81/100 against 56/100 for Mirobody, so it is the safer default.
openGym ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Mirobody.
If you want the quickest setup, openGym is easier to run; Mirobody needs more configuration.
openGym is growing faster right now (+2 924 stars in 30 days).
Mirobody details →openGym details →
Swap a project
Keep Mirobody, compare it with
Keep openGym, compare it with