MikroDashvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MikroDash | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 633 | 24 069 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +791 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.8.78 · 29 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+791 stars in 30 days).
MikroDash details →temporal details →