bettercapvsMikroDash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bettercap | MikroDash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Network Security | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 20 214 | 632 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +193 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.41.7 · 11 May 2026 | v0.8.77 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
bettercap scores 75/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.
MikroDash ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for bettercap.
If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; bettercap needs more configuration.
bettercap is growing faster right now (+193 stars in 30 days).
bettercap details →MikroDash details →
Swap a project
Keep bettercap, compare it with
Keep MikroDash, compare it with