MediaMTXvsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaMTX | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 20 540 | 11 123 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +288 | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).
MediaMTX details →SonarQube details →
Swap a project
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with
Keep SonarQube, compare it with