livekitvsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| livekit | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 21 912 | 11 123 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +813 | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.
livekit is growing faster right now (+813 stars in 30 days).
livekit details →SonarQube details →
Swap a project
Keep livekit, compare it with
Keep SonarQube, compare it with