MediaCMSvsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaCMS | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 5 171 | 11 123 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 12 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
SonarQube scores 71/100 against 67/100 for MediaCMS, so it is the safer default.
MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaCMS is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
SonarQube is growing faster right now (+101 stars in 30 days).
MediaCMS details →SonarQube details →