MediaCMSvssandboxed.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaCMS | sandboxed.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #97 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 172 | 678 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 9 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
MediaCMS scores 67/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.
MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for sandboxed.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaCMS is easier to run; sandboxed.sh needs more configuration.
MediaCMS is growing faster right now (+47 stars in 30 days).
MediaCMS details →sandboxed.sh details →