hostingvssandboxed.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | sandboxed.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #97 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 678 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
sandboxed.sh scores 50/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
sandboxed.sh ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
sandboxed.sh is growing faster right now (+6 stars in 30 days).
hosting details →sandboxed.sh details →