MemosvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Memos | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 64 166 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +851 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.31.0 · 19 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Memos scores 86/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Memos ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Memos is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
Memos is growing faster right now (+851 stars in 30 days).
Memos details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Memos, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with