Matomovsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Matomo | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 21 in Web analytics | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 21 985 | 93 040 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +91 | +1 246 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 | 19 |
| Latest release | 6.0.0-b9.20261028180522 · 28 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 74/100 for Matomo, so it is the safer default.
Matomo ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Matomo needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 246 stars in 30 days).
Matomo details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep Matomo, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with