PostHogvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PostHog | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in Analytics | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 40 497 | 93 036 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +588 | +1 289 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3501 | 19 |
| Latest release | agent-skills-v0.3891.0 · 29 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 81/100 for PostHog, so it is the safer default.
PostHog ships more often: 3501 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; PostHog needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 289 stars in 30 days).
PostHog details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep PostHog, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with