MatomovsUmami
Two self-hosted Web analytics projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Matomo | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 21 in Web analytics | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 21 986 | 39 753 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +93 | +772 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 | 13 |
| Latest release | 6.0.0-b9.20261028180522 · 28 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Umami scores 85/100 against 74/100 for Matomo, so it is the safer default.
Matomo ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; Matomo needs more configuration.
Umami is growing faster right now (+772 stars in 30 days).
Matomo details →Umami details →All Web analytics projects →
Swap a project
Keep Matomo, compare it with
Keep Umami, compare it with