Matomovstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Matomo | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 21 in Web analytics | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 21 985 | 24 052 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +91 | +774 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 | 11 |
| Latest release | 6.0.0-b9.20261028180522 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 74/100 for Matomo, so it is the safer default.
Matomo ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, Matomo is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+774 stars in 30 days).
Matomo details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep Matomo, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with