temporalvsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| temporal | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Workflow | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 24 049 | 39 757 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +771 | +761 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 13 |
| Latest release | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Umami scores 85/100 against 82/100 for temporal, so it is the safer default.
Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal details →Umami details →
Swap a project
Keep temporal, compare it with
Keep Umami, compare it with