LubeLoggervsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LubeLogger | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 89 717 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +70 | +2 428 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 428 stars in 30 days).
LubeLogger details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with