LubeLoggervsteslamateapi
Two self-hosted Vehicle Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LubeLogger | teslamateapi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #3 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 924 | 257 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +68 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.25.0 · 7 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
LubeLogger scores 65/100 against 46/100 for teslamateapi, so it is the safer default.
LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for teslamateapi.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; teslamateapi needs more configuration.
LubeLogger is growing faster right now (+68 stars in 30 days).
LubeLogger details →teslamateapi details →All Vehicle Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with
Keep teslamateapi, compare it with