LubeLoggervsWindowsinDocker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LubeLogger | WindowsinDocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 53 715 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +70 | +330 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for WindowsinDocker.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; WindowsinDocker needs more configuration.
WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+330 stars in 30 days).
LubeLogger details →WindowsinDocker details →
Swap a project
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with
Keep WindowsinDocker, compare it with