LubeLoggervstorqvoice
Two self-hosted Vehicle Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LubeLogger | torqvoice | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #4 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 45 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +70 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 22 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.2.64 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
LubeLogger scores 65/100 against 43/100 for torqvoice, so it is the safer default.
torqvoice ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for LubeLogger.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; torqvoice needs more configuration.
LubeLogger is growing faster right now (+70 stars in 30 days).
LubeLogger details →torqvoice details →All Vehicle Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with
Keep torqvoice, compare it with