LubeLoggervsProject N.O.M.A.D.
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LubeLogger | Project N.O.M.A.D. | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 41 177 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +2 826 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Project N.O.M.A.D..
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; Project N.O.M.A.D. needs more configuration.
Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 826 stars in 30 days).
LubeLogger details →Project N.O.M.A.D. details →
Swap a project
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with
Keep Project N.O.M.A.D., compare it with