LubeLoggervsOrca
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LubeLogger | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 109 139 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +9 232 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 16 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Orca.
Orca is growing faster right now (+9 232 stars in 30 days).
LubeLogger details →Orca details →
Swap a project
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with
Keep Orca, compare it with