LoomFlowvsSim
Two self-hosted n8n alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LoomFlow | Sim | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 7 in AI Workflows | #13 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 136 | 29 933 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +219 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 165 |
| Latest release | v0.1.11 · 2 Sept 2026 | v0.9.36 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Sim scores 77/100 against 44/100 for LoomFlow, so it is the safer default.
Sim ships more often: 165 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for LoomFlow.
Sim is growing faster right now (+219 stars in 30 days).
LoomFlow details →Sim details → All n8n alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep LoomFlow, compare it with
Keep Sim, compare it with