ActivepiecesvsLoomFlow
Two self-hosted n8n alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | LoomFlow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #5 of 7 in AI Workflows |
| GitHub stars | 25 264 | 136 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +564 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 | 9 |
| Latest release | 0.90.4-hotfix.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.1.11 · 2 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 81/100 against 44/100 for LoomFlow, so it is the safer default.
Activepieces ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for LoomFlow.
If you want the quickest setup, Activepieces is easier to run; LoomFlow needs more configuration.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+564 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →LoomFlow details → All n8n alternatives →