LAN-Orangutanvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LAN-Orangutan | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 139 | 93 036 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 289 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 19 |
| Latest release | v3.4.2 · 18 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 58/100 for LAN-Orangutan, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for LAN-Orangutan.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 289 stars in 30 days).
LAN-Orangutan details →uptime-kuma details →