LAN-Orangutanvsmitmproxy
Two self-hosted Network Monitoring projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LAN-Orangutan | mitmproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 1 137 | 46 448 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 313 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.4.2 · 18 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 58/100 for LAN-Orangutan, so it is the safer default.
LAN-Orangutan ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.
If you want the quickest setup, LAN-Orangutan is easier to run; mitmproxy needs more configuration.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 313 stars in 30 days).
LAN-Orangutan details →mitmproxy details →All Network Monitoring projects →