LAN-Orangutanvslangflow
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LAN-Orangutan | langflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 1 139 | 156 112 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +921 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 20 |
| Latest release | v3.4.2 · 18 Oct 2026 | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 58/100 for LAN-Orangutan, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for LAN-Orangutan.
If you want the quickest setup, LAN-Orangutan is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+921 stars in 30 days).
LAN-Orangutan details →langflow details →